|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeMenNew Balance Men's MX608V2 Training Shoe |
|
|  | | | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: ( 71 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
123 of 130 found the following review helpful:
 Used to be a good shoe but now worthless Sep 24, 2009
By Donald Leighty
I've worn New Balance shoes for walking since the late '80s or early '90s. They lasted years. Last fall I bought a new pair that started to fall apart within a few months (since I haven't been taking daily walks for almost a year now, this was brought about merely by walking the dog and pushing a lawnmower around the yard). Another pair did the same thing, so I started hassling NB a couple of weeks ago. Told them the shoes looked like they had a bad sunburn, with a thin, rubbery white coating peeling and shedding from the synthetic foam underneath. It's completely gone from the toe and much of the sides. Where's the leather???
After getting several conflicting stories from the girls who answer the phones (and sending one pair of MX608s back to their laboratory for an 'examination'), I finally received the following explanation from someone higher up:
"Thank you for contacting New Balance Consumer Support!
The tip, vamp, entire heel area and the quarters of the MX608 are all leather. It is called split leather because it is "split away" from the top layer, which is called full grain. The 2-3 layers you can split away from that are called split leathers. The surface of the split is treated with a pu coating and painted. Splits are real leather.
The mudguard area of the shoe is a synthetic material. This is the area along the sides directly above the midsole. If this area of the shoe is abrading, then what you are seeing could be the backing of the synthetic material which is made of compressed fibers.
Additionally, very few athletic shoes are made of top grain or full grain leather anymore. It is just too expensive. All of the 608s are made this way, so there should not be a difference among different pairs."
This gave me enough information to start digging into the realities of "split leather" (or "bicast leather" as it is more commonly known). This is from Wikipedia:
"Bicast leather (also known as bycast leather, split leather or PU leather) is a split leather with a layer of polyurethane applied to the surface and then embossed. Bycast was originally made for the shoe industry and recently was adopted by the furniture industry. The resulting product is cheaper than top grain leather and has an artificially consistent texture and is easier to clean and maintain.
The use of the term 'leather' in relation to this bicast treatment is considered a misrepresentation and therefore not permitted in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Furniture made with bicast exhibits none of the characteristics associated with genuine leather; it will not develop a patina or suppleness nor otherwise "improve with age". With constant use the polyurethane layer will crack and split free of its backing.
Modern technology permits up to 3 or 4 horizontal layers being taken from the one hide. The leather used in the backing of bicast is a thin, otherwise worthless, layer remaining after better quality layers have been removed for traditional leather work and contributes nothing to the look and feel of the end product."
Nice.
That's Wikipedia's take, but the conclusions match those of professional leatherworkers as well. New Balance has changed from a durable real leather upper to a bicast "leather", the use of which several countries have already ruled is deliberately misleading.
50 of 50 found the following review helpful:
Shoe not made the same way anymore Jan 19, 2010
By T. Moore
I have bought the same mx608 shoe from amazon for 3 years.. finishing up my third pair now. I ordered these thinking I'd be getting the same thing.. I thought wrong. I guess the "v2" on the label should have tipped me off. Anyways, the shoe feels like a piece of cardboard now. There is no support on the soles anymore (feels like you are walking on concrete). Nothing like the last 3 pairs of mx608's I've had. Now I have to search around for another good supporting shoe. Why NB did you screw this up?
32 of 33 found the following review helpful:
Sharp decline in quality Apr 17, 2010
By Kevin J. Violette
I've been wearing these black New Balance trainers for years. They have changed a few times but the quality was high. The last pair I bought will be the last pair I buy. First the dye bled and turned my white socks blue. Within a few months the shoes began to split at the seams. It's sad to see a decline in quality this rapid.
13 of 14 found the following review helpful:
This shoe used to be good enough to recommend to friends Dec 16, 2009
By The Cooking Gardener
I have been shopping for a couple of pairs of the MX608 to give as a Christmas gift to someone who has been wearing that model for several years, but after finding out that the company has cheapened the design with faux materials ruined that plan. I wonder, can anyone recommend another shoe comparable to what the MX608 *used* to be?
9 of 9 found the following review helpful:
 Performed just great Sep 30, 2010
By Robert C. Mason
"Rob"
I was a little leery after seeing some negative reviews to purchase this shoe for a long vacation with a lot of walking in Europe this past summer. But the reasonable price and my past experiences with New Balance products swayed me to make the buy. This shoe performed great in every terrain with lots of walking and hiking every day all over Europe. They were the only pair of shoes I took and their comfort, traction and resilience to foul weather were beyond my expectations. We must have walked an easily 12 miles a day for the better part of a month mostly on hard surfaces and the comfort of my feet were never an issue. I have only owned the shoes 5 months but they are holding up wonderful and competed the task I asked them to.
See all 71 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
